Introduction to the Liberty Gardeners

A censorship-resistant discussion group for principled, proactionary libertarians

Also published at: Substack

The libertygardeners Signal group is for principled, pro-actionary libertarians who want to:

To date, Substack has not inserted itself unduly between its writers and their audience.

However, as a proprietary service, that could change at any time.

Similarly, if Google decided to block my emails, it could cut me off from a large portion of my audience.

Therefore, I have created the libertygardeners group as a censorship-resistant discussion space for fans of my writing.

Like a subreddit, the libertygardeners group is open to anyone.

Unlike a subreddit, it will not be spied upon or censored by Reddit (or Facebook, X, or Substack).

Instead, it will be moderated by me (Archer T. Ships) and delegated associates.

Common Topics

Common topics include, but are not limited to, the following:

Since I do not necessarily know everyone in the group, please do not post anything you would not want shared with the broader internet.

Rules

  1. Follow the Platinum Rule: “Do unto others as they would have you do unto them.” Ask yourself, “Is this message likely to be received as courteous by the recipients?” Rudeness toward users may result in your comments being removed; repeated violations may result in a ban.

  2. Be substantive. Respect other people’s time and bandwidth. Make a good-faith effort to answer your own questions before asking the group.

  3. Source your facts. If you claim something to be true, please be ready to back it up with a credible source.

  4. Address the arguments, not the person. Make a good-faith effort to steelman the arguments of those who disagree with you.

  5. Share expert knowledge. When you post a question and receive intelligent answers, share the results with others. If you are an expert, post resources and references about your subject.

  6. Avoid logical fallacies.

  7. Be forgiving. Assume goodwill and remain courteous even when others are not.


Footnotes

  1. Michael Huemer, “Ethical Intuitionism and the Case for Libertarianism,” LMU Law Review, Vol. 4, Iss. 1, 2017. This paper establishes the moral framework for principled libertarianism by applying common-sense intuition to political philosophy. https://digitalcommons.lmunet.edu/lmulrev/vol4/iss1/6/

  2. Max More, “The Proactionary Principle,” Extropy Institute, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2005. This source defines the pro-actionary stance as a proactive approach to technological risk and human enhancement. https://www.extropy.org/proactionaryprinciple.htm

  3. Michael Huemer, “Ethical Intuitionism and the Case for Libertarianism,” LMU Law Review, Vol. 4, Iss. 1, 2017. This specific section of the essay outlines why libertarianism is the most ethically consistent political philosophy for the individual. https://digitalcommons.lmunet.edu/lmulrev/vol4/iss1/6/

  4. Archer T. Ships, “Lifebonds: How You Can Live to be 500+ Years Old,” Archer Ships Substack, 2025. This article outlines the specific biological and financial milestones required to achieve radical life extension. https://archerships.substack.com/p/lifebonds-how-you-can-live-to-be

  5. Archer T. Ships, “The Arawa Island Project,” Archer Ships Substack, 2025. This post discusses the geographical and legal foundations for establishing a new libertarian jurisdiction in the Pacific. https://archerships.substack.com/p/the-arawa-island-project

  6. Archer T. Ships, “The Case for Libertarian Hope,” Archer Ships Substack, 2025. This essay argues for a vision of the future where technology and liberty are used to transform the environment into a flourishing “Garden of Eden.” https://archerships.substack.com/p/the-case-for-libertarian-hope

  7. Archer T. Ships, “Breed ‘Em for Freedom,” Archer Ships Substack, 2025. This piece explores the demographic strategy of pronatalism as a means to ensure the long-term viability of libertarian ideals. https://archerships.substack.com/p/breed-em-for-freedom

  8. Wikipedia contributors, “List of fallacies,” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 2025. This comprehensive index serves as a guide for participants to identify and avoid common errors in reasoning during group discussions. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

Want to stay in touch?