---
title: ""The judge first ruled that Thomas was off the hook financially, but…"
date: 2019-01-26
source: facebook
type: Archer T. Ships shared a link.
---

# "The judge first ruled that Thomas was off the hook financially, but…

*January 26, 2019 · Facebook*

::::: {}
::: {}
[https://5newsonline.com/2017/01/12/oklahoma-man-ordered-to-pay-child-support-despite-not-being-father/?fbclid=IwAR0ee_ZIlBKeQwgz-0YAAAM0nCzOAv2M1bvts8\--EsT4g2Uqj7z6kUt8oCc](https://5newsonline.com/2017/01/12/oklahoma-man-ordered-to-pay-child-support-despite-not-being-father/?fbclid=IwAR0ee_ZIlBKeQwgz-0YAAAM0nCzOAv2M1bvts8--EsT4g2Uqj7z6kUt8oCc){target="_blank"}
:::

::: {}
\"The judge first ruled that Thomas was off the hook financially, but then reversed the decision because Oklahoma law says men must question paternity within two years of the child's birth.\
\
Thomas said that he had no reason to question it before he did, but, because he missed the deadline, the judge ordered him to pay around \$500 a month in child support and nearly \$15,000 in back support -- for a child that is not his.\"
:::
:::::