---
title: "Christopher Sutton I don't think that AI's are at the point where..."
date: 2022-12-03
source: facebook
type: comment
context: "Archer T. Ships replied to Christian Kleineidam's comment."
fb_link: "https://www.facebook.com/dyi/l/?l=AYOm1CHRlbivZq9jWR90jADgRUY-OUR1tCmAH_TRm-2zN_MHIW59_m0Z45FsflQE62kRyK1ZgLBUQ7aOd4MT2DZn0NXiHGyDeDhVIMlHCs5LCQcaoc1HUlqhSLlxNPVsUUF_8ZFBV8mhFnx6d1S091rqYZHJdBstpuIH37IgGoT5A1ArEfsLe8UpGRgnsToaSl9D54wuwyXB&s=519"
---

# Christopher Sutton I don't think that AI's are at the point where...

*December 3, 2022 — Comment Archer T. Ships replied to Christian Kleineidam's comment.*

Christopher Sutton I don't think that AI's are at the point where they could pass for human in all domains.  But I don't think that point is far off.  AI development is in a feedback loop which will accelerate the rate of improvements.  I don't think instilling "drives" or "emotions" (or sufficient facsimile's thereof) are that far off. I also don't think that AI's will be hostile to us, in general.  I think they will mostly be indifferent to positive to us.  (The same way that we are to most animals.)