---
title: "Brad Templeton  Well, when such courses are implemented, I expect..."
date: 2023-01-12
source: facebook
type: comment
context: "Archer T. Ships replied to his own comment."
fb_link: "https://www.facebook.com/dyi/l/?l=AYObOLzK_MkH350zwfwC4YYoQ9y-UvpA8fLl9MZ2ev6K233Mi4ge1M0dDZY_avune-KSL8Luv8E5k2rCgNqIvNtx75PIXe5Zoh7eY44vb7IbQnblWQDiuvTZx2zV6xTyjoOyqXR6-TZlgh4GGToCdORnPpWPxLwQ69Srh69h_slKtJi7iAOjE1ipZcms4JuuzeVPyTBI8EY&s=519"
---

# Brad Templeton  Well, when such courses are implemented, I expect...

*January 12, 2023 — Comment Archer T. Ships replied to his own comment.*

Brad Templeton  Well, when such courses are implemented, I expect there will be variation on what content is covered. From my perspective, being controversial and modern is a good thing. One of the big problems of state-run schools is that the curriculum doesn't try to tie what students are learning to problems that are relevant to them. And one of the important lessons should be to recognize when use of a tactic is a 'dark art'.  For example, I don't think it's a dark art to boycott a homophobic baker.  But I do think it's a dark art to boycott an egalitarian baker.  But, in the real world, it's often complicated (as the discussion of JK Rowling above indicates).