---
title: "Monalisa Granting for the sake of argument the legitimacy of..."
date: 2023-01-13
source: facebook
type: comment
context: "Archer T. Ships replied to his own comment."
fb_link: "https://www.facebook.com/dyi/l/?l=AYPG7tNVOCDw4FrDKTfYfzLHW4p-R7cvjelHlyge0WzWEEowXiuJIj_8dz-jPf-Q33Fps13TxPemPz_6CQsRRUkUNaFvx-4oRRcqCgnXtCm5nc7pjT0u5ddOuKNVw29kSQHMVutfIiDpWbkgW1kIXU0gnC2mzAXE1PbdU1pNHHGobjyH3gAfLX1gNvx0ghNaI-3NiWR7buE&s=519"
---

# Monalisa Granting for the sake of argument the legitimacy of...

*January 13, 2023 — Comment Archer T. Ships replied to his own comment.*

Monalisa Granting for the sake of argument the legitimacy of copyright law, if you study another artist, and that artist influences your work, I don't think that gives them the right to demand royalties from you.  Writing a novel in the style of Anne Rice isn't the same as copying Anne Rice's work.  Yes, AI's train on copyrighted works, but so does every other artist.  The prompt + AI's work is still original.