---
title: "Daniel OJ You're right, even without the state private property would..."
date: 2023-03-08
source: facebook
type: comment
context: "Archer T. Ships replied to Daniel OJ's comment."
fb_link: "https://www.facebook.com/dyi/l/?l=AYN8tDLkR49Az2Z5Z9_CdL4cpMlSPSfYbHVKmMzTTg1zPpXvbvRzwYRqRfG18Tpw98SsJDHSUsTfKpd9C3fY0kTjGd7XojFopxgxSM8xNe6m7E46DjCX7N9qb5U93b77GOOzLDVFSmVO2CrXb1_HX7kWEw8eRHb0ECNSqyKLq-MSAhXQqHxuSbwaT-BKG-qQSa0JL54HIQU&s=519"
---

# Daniel OJ You're right, even without the state private property would...

*March 8, 2023 — Comment Archer T. Ships replied to Daniel OJ's comment.*

Daniel OJ You're right, even without the state private property would have boundaries and doors would have locks.  And in a more libertarian world, perhaps other people would respect the right of property owners to invite whom they please onto their own property.  Or hire whom they please without seeking some remote bureaucrats permission.  Or love someone without fear that cops will show up to their door, and drag them away.