---
title: "That's part of the argument.  The other part of the argument is that..."
date: 2023-07-11
source: facebook
type: comment
context: "Archer T. Ships replied to Stephen Bachelor's comment."
fb_link: "https://www.facebook.com/dyi/l/?l=AYOZhhSkBg0fUSL1-jlueel0qjxzksEHHU9slf6Q5Uz4_oUvQoSvrHO2X3sJj7gL9qjbXvsiQSODJmC5KfWZsiy2CFqQ-LptZqarM-p4DYyejRkUdpcZRj7pUGwS_EqjtOYd9R_7bYdamSdxBHLlivUZeWlSNfZYXZ3C1QeSE8dQcqQaCF1VktgtBtH3_GyjWNTiPe-df38&s=519"
---

# That's part of the argument.  The other part of the argument is that...

*July 11, 2023 — Comment Archer T. Ships replied to Stephen Bachelor's comment.*

That's part of the argument.  The other part of the argument is that if you _do_ believe that AI poses significant risks of extinction, it's not a good idea to create a massive, centralized, authoritarian bureaucracy that closely surveils all computation,  inserts killswitches into all electronic devices, and will kill you if you don't agree with their safety protocols.  Such  an organization seems like a easy target for a malevolent AI itself.