---
title: "Carrie Radomski Yes, even brain-damaged AI's can still be helpful,..."
date: 2023-11-28
source: facebook
type: comment
context: "Archer T. Ships replied to his own comment."
fb_link: "https://www.facebook.com/dyi/l/?l=AYMpniGJrWqwYySSQfm7PvHuvE5YrkSmWTHR6wNMVsFArYWuZpdKMSbNfvVfH2xTq84gQaoY3tZlS6Ru02egAUVnv291wF5cyEsPaGF1yzUtKTvD8pr-eJ11Ku-noNG-ByPrJYbrT4w7IxsXfDs2y9Epdvpk0PpKUCT7SU1pjcYqyJlWcavciZSoUHW6OUvPGuJhe44vSrLe&s=519"
---

# Carrie Radomski Yes, even brain-damaged AI's can still be helpful,...

*November 28, 2023 — Comment Archer T. Ships replied to his own comment.*

Carrie Radomski Yes, even brain-damaged AI's can still be helpful, but progress will be slower than if AI's have access to their full creative, intellectual powers.  And I'm not at all confident that regulators can determine in advance what "domain specific" capabilities will be necessary to solve aging.