---
title: "Lance Harting I don't doubt that aviation fuel is more energy dense. ..."
date: 2025-06-06
source: facebook
type: comment
context: "Archer T. Ships replied to Lance Harting's comment."
fb_link: "https://www.facebook.com/dyi/l/?l=AYMDu3AdlWl1wQLxks0lieZZjfpGYsgVk7J4Kbo4Jlb7y8ooWgBFcuToy6WP7uRQrXwsluySXiuLEk07p55Zm1W03HUhStOyMEQEbEwSgufse5ViBQfPQpyjtkBmETgQmQpxPFLZhILVdSocJBGWCz8MjByTs2TLolJf5mk-0vzUx09BR54ZYGijPq4WWJY0-ZQqMtuxXOI&s=519"
---

# Lance Harting I don't doubt that aviation fuel is more energy dense. ...

*June 6, 2025 — Comment Archer T. Ships replied to Lance Harting's comment.*

Lance Harting I don't doubt that aviation fuel is more energy dense.  However, the question is whether they can get useful range with current tech.  They say that existing battery technology gives them a range of 180 miles at 180 mph.  If they can go at airplane speeds anywhere a boat can dock, that seems like a useful range.