---
title: "Elizabeth Jack >  And just because the constitution doesn't protect..."
date: 2025-08-11
source: facebook
type: comment
context: "Archer T. Ships replied to his own comment."
fb_link: "https://www.facebook.com/dyi/l/?l=AYNoa7fyk2bSyB3Oj4CLQ2AzC-7bO317MbUEvB9Z0annaC3Ircq6N9-DEkEAAEKeo8g-9OdNcNveZhCLEOOg6V5rtMggwb4PYaNQ0Yq2WAbrLM1f2RfHNZqIPPA1Bq0j8zl2XGO6GdnxEdPWVTmQA_8jIRI5T5vUFs-ZG5IAyy0OSmKf2IUAXzXKXedImXLZiZGNNm09iig&s=519"
---

# Elizabeth Jack >  And just because the constitution doesn't protect...

*August 11, 2025 — Comment Archer T. Ships replied to his own comment.*

Elizabeth Jack >  And just because the constitution doesn't protect non-Americans as such doesn't mean that limiting the speech of any individual is ethically acceptable. Agree.  But nativists typically assign little weight to the well-being / freedom of immigrants.  So I was trying to appeal to his self interest, not his compassion.