---
title: "Izdaari Eristikon Being a bigot, by itself, doesn't violate..."
date: 2025-09-14
source: facebook
type: comment
context: "Archer T. Ships replied to Carrie-Anne Hoke's comment."
fb_link: "https://www.facebook.com/dyi/l/?l=AYMr-L75MmoCRtC9qX7xAkYMqgoZtALfYps4ljAZ6vqCKkOB0XPkJrDAC2PO89wig0MJEvEeNSuwk2cWIncYlPcBW8lwMeMRtpETbafzB0D5amX1i9997WYnZncKnzPgVjgMpIkD3yWporyA9HMnr8K0U8y548Zsv2yv7i_rn7Cps3r3a7vdxeFm2kgnTtrcYW0k1FgEtOE&s=519"
---

# Izdaari Eristikon Being a bigot, by itself, doesn't violate...

*September 14, 2025 — Comment Archer T. Ships replied to Carrie-Anne Hoke's comment.*

Izdaari Eristikon Being a bigot, by itself, doesn't violate libertarian principles. If someone doesn't want to associate with blacks/Mexicans/Iranians, it's their right to refuse entry to them on their property. However, bigots are generally stupid, economically illiterate, and hypocritical. IME, they almost always privilege their hatred/fear of blacks/gays/immigrants over their commitment to liberty.   They typically assign zero weight to the harms that they cause to the groups they fear/hate. So the increase in the population of bigots in the LP has been accompanied by more support for more authoritarianism, such as immigration suppression laws.
