---
title: "Adrian Scott It's not lawfare if: 1.  The law actually exists (and is..."
date: 2025-09-30
source: facebook
type: comment
context: "Archer T. Ships replied to Adrian Scott's comment."
fb_link: "https://www.facebook.com/dyi/l/?l=AYOv9I3pygpVS7b87hrmrMR4ulATgYAp9mEVpqrQNg9w8rkmctdYPCxtkTbi4LrA5IfGkL57cOwydO6wTMHlf7lYeeBjLwvfad1nH7AwZuG4ONWK-dhhzU_vY-r2XpEdeJJpLNubhFmXYMbUXF5d9I2DOOvx0TusyWBSs-_QtyzlelJU6ePW5TdKxuYIr-RaBe1iuuMc1SM&s=519"
---

# Adrian Scott It's not lawfare if: 1.  The law actually exists (and is...

*September 30, 2025 — Comment Archer T. Ships replied to Adrian Scott's comment.*

Adrian Scott It's not lawfare if: 1.  The law actually exists (and is not made up by a partisan judge). 2.  The law itself is ethical (the law protects individual liberty, not government tyranny). 3.  The person has been convicted of violating the law in a just trial (and has not been falsely convicted in rigged show trial). 4. The law is applied neutrally to all parties (and not selectively to the ruling party's enemies). I advocate for all of those conditions to be met.